Sandiganbayan acquits ex-Albay official Grex Lagman – but reports differ on the charge
A court cleared ex-Albay official Grex Lagman, but the reports don't agree on what the case was even about.
By YouScoop Desk · · 1 min read
The gist
- The Sandiganbayan acquitted former Albay official Grex Lagman, according to three reports.
- The reports differ on the charge: one calls it bribery, another an illegal gambling case tied to jueteng claims.
- Inquirer.net says the acquittal came after witnesses recanted their jueteng claims.
Why it matters
This is a court ruling involving a former local official, so the details matter for anyone following public accountability cases. The reports don't match on the charge or his title, so checking the official court record is the safest way to know the facts.
The Sandiganbayan has acquitted former Albay official Grex Lagman, based on reports from Manila Standard, Inquirer.net, and Daily Tribune. In simple terms, the anti-graft court cleared him of the case filed against him, so he is no longer facing that charge.
All three reports cover the same core news: the acquittal. But the details are not the same across the stories, so readers should note which version they are reading.
The first big gap is the charge itself. Manila Standard describes it as a bribery rap, while Daily Tribune calls it an illegal gambling case. Inquirer.net ties the case to jueteng claims, a term that also appears in its headline.
The second gap is his title. Manila Standard and Inquirer.net both call him an ex-Albay governor, but Daily Tribune lists him as an ex-Albay vice governor. Since the reports disagree, it is safer to stick with former Albay official until the court documents are checked.
What the witnesses changed
Inquirer.net reports that the acquittal came after witnesses recanted their jueteng claims. This is the one detail the sources give that explains a turning point in the case.
The sources do not explain in full how the court reached its decision. The reports provided do not lay out the complete reasoning behind the ruling, so the full picture is not yet clear from what is available.
As for what happens next, the sources do not say whether the ruling will be appealed or what it means for Lagman's future. Any next step has not been confirmed in these reports.
For Filipino readers, this is a reminder that a court outcome can shift a story quickly, especially when witnesses change their statements. It also shows why the official court record matters more than early headlines.
Would you wait for the full court decision before forming an opinion, or do you usually go with the first headlines you see?
Background
Inquirer.net reports that witnesses had made jueteng claims in the case, and later recanted them. Recanting means the witnesses took back what they had earlier said.
Sources
This story is written in our own words from reports by Manila Standard and Daily Tribune. Spotted an error? Tell us.
Up next
Choco Mucho celebrates big win over Creamline – Eya Laure played through pain
Choco Mucho cheered a big win over Creamline, with Eya Laure fighting through pain to help deliver it.
